[77 / 9 / ?]
It was supposed to be the great milestone of the franchise, the first, official, mainline console pokemon game. People have been clamoring for that since stadium, thinking about all the cool visuals and crazy things they could finally do once they weren't held back by handheld hardware. Games like Colosseum, XD, and Battle Revolution were teasers for the sort of stuff we could eventually see. Then the hype season kicks off proper with the news that half the roster is now gone... but that it's ok, since that means the game's gonna have better visuals, animations, and balance! Then the game finally comes out and... visually and gameplay wise, it's an upscaled 3ds game. A majority of models and animations are the same ones they've been recycling since 2013, story's just as shit as ever, arguable worse since it doesn't even properly start until the very end of the game where you're railroaded through it. The wild area, the big selling point of the game, is just a glorified safari zone you can fully see in 20 minutes right when you get there at the start of the game. No other optional side areas, optional side attractions /facilities, nothing. You better enjoy admiring the safari golf course and the same raid battle (less fun totem fights) over and over, because that's the bulk of your game/all of your endgame. In my eyes, the reason it fucked everything up is because it failed to live up to the hype/expectations. A good chunk of us were expecting a full and proper mainline console game, and instead got more of the same with a 480p to 720p facelift. >"whatever, the game was perfectly fine, you're just ENTITLED" Built up hype aside, the simple fact of the matter is pricetags/hardware set expectations. They charged $60 for this, they demanded the AAA price, as such, people expected the AAA treatment/experience, and objectively they fell short of it. Compare this to ANY other big budget AAA game on the switch and it falls short of all of them.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
TL;DR but i agree with you
Anonymous
Anonymous
Not really, the game is still huge with hundreds of hours of gameplay at the same quality as previously
Anonymous
>>43676525 The game is fun
Seethe for another year /v/tard
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676525 holy fuck sticky?
Anonymous
>>43676563 DON'T ASK QUESTIONS
Anonymous
>>43676580 you know that you're not being any more objective by disliking something? I know 4chan has trained you to believe as much, but you can consume, enjoy something, and still have an objective sense of its quality
Anonymous
It was always only ever a kid's series that adults played, why would it change at this stage, manchild?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>43676549 >>43676563 Cope
Imagine a game where pic related is mono fighting but a kung fu panda ripoff is fighting/water
End me now
Anonymous
>>43676683 why does that matter at all?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676525 just don’t buy it dipshit
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676683 Imagine crying about a game you don't like for a whole year like a typical /v/tard instead of moving on and finding a new hobby
Anonymous
>>43676686 I was just mad about that, but that's not the main problem. Imagine a pokemon game with the same (or worse) quality as its predecessor at a much higher price on a better console. And they had to cut out content to make it work.
Basically a 3ds game at a console price
Anonymous
>$60 >AAA price Do... do you actualy know what AAA even means?
Anonymous
>>43676724 never adding content isn't cutting it
Anonymous
Shills are tremoring at this post
Anonymous
>>43676724 The quality is well above other first versions, with More content than ever
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676741 average /vp/ poster only plays nintendo games, industry terms are wholly foreign to them
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>43676525 Preasu undastando
Anonymous
>>43676525 >Compare this to ANY other big budget AAA game on the switch and it falls short of all of them. You mean like Breath of the Wild and it's 10 enemy types that they make look unique by giving them different weapons and paint jobs? Or Animal Crossing with its 10 different villagers that they make look unique by giving them different paint jobs? Maybe you're talking about Mario Kart 8 Recycled since no one bought a Wii U? Or was it Super Mario Maker 2 where the best feature from the previous game (the Amiibo costumes) was gutted entirely? Help me out here.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676937 Real shame they can't seem to make either.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676525 >MA CHAMP! MA MA CHAMP! CHAMP MACHAMP! Anonymous
>>43676626 ultimate cope image
Anonymous
>>43677050 ultimate cope thread
Anonymous
>>43677086 ultimate cope reply
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677102 ultimate cope board
Anonymous
>people were expecting a grand adventure open world style game >on the switch >from gamefreak >developed in 2 years You people are fucking ridiculous and only do this to yourselves. There was no reason to believe this wasn't going to be USUM HD. The only thing I will give you is the whole pokedex situation but that's it. Anyone expecting Skyrim but with Pokemon was delusional
Anonymous
>>43676773 >>43676930 I know, despite Distant Kingdom paying them for 6 months they STILL weren't able to change the narrative to one where the games were received badly.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676942 BOTW didn't even have dungeons, just bite sized puzzle sections. But it's all fine and grandiose because there's like 500 of them
Anonymous
Quoted By:
This is what everyone deserves for buying the low effort garbage that was USUM.
Anonymous
>>43676525 >Games like Colosseum, XD, and Battle Revolution were teasers for the sort of stuff we could eventually see There's literally nothing these games have that SWSH doesn't already do
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677244 >giving distantcuckdom free publicity despite nobody bringing him up maybe it is you who is the shill
how much does he pay you to spread his name to try to save his dying channel?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676525 >My rant was good enough to become a copypasta feels good bro
Anonymous
>>43676609 >not the properly translated one Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677634 They're both functionally the same - they both show Game Freak dabbing on Mario club autists when making their kid's game.
Anonymous
>>43676525 they should have sold it for 40 bucks because price sets expetations and for 60 i can get botw, odysse, xeno2, astralchain and more
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676525 Based OP. I still haven't bought it, seethe for me cucksoomers.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677338 how about a good story for pokemon standards better animations of idle and attacks
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676600 when you say "seethe /v/tard" in response to a perfectly valid critique of something then chances are you don't have an objective opinion on it lol
Anonymous
>>43676798 Lmao no, I breezed through this game faster than any other pokemon game. LESS content than other. Most of the time it was boring anyway, and you can get infinite exp by the wild area very quickly
I got it as a gift btw, I didn't want to buy it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676751 They cut both pokemon and moves. Not just useless moves like barrage eother, they cut good moves like hp and pursuit, and gimmick moves like assist
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676525 >imagine still caring pokemon past gen 2 holy shit pfhahahaha
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677661 Be honest dipshit, none of those games is worth $60 and trying to justify THEM being $60 and not Pokémon is fucking ridiculous, especially when Pokémon's larger than most if not all of them.
Anonymous
>>43676600 if you had an objective sense of quality you wouldn't defend the worst pokemon games in terms of price / content ratio
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677215 At least USUM had more than 10 routes
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677735 >i dun liek it so it's bait He was talking paired versions, not the shitty rehashes anon. Keep up.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677785 Pokémon were never content retard.
Anonymous
>>43676942 >You mean like Breath of the Wild and it's 10 enemy types that they make look unique by giving them different weapons and paint jobs? A disappointing drawback, but that doesn't erase the legitimate open world, open ended approach, weapon variety, combat mechanics, and many other additions over past games
>Or Animal Crossing with its 10 different villagers that they make look unique by giving them different paint jobs? That's... the whole appeal anon, Their looks set them apart, not (specifically) the dialogue, what's your point?
>Maybe you're talking about Mario Kart 8 Recycled since no one bought a Wii U? >Yes, it's a port with extra features, how is that a negative? >Or was it Super Mario Maker 2 where the best feature from the previous game (the Amiibo costumes) was gutted entirely? Yes,
https://www.ign.com/articles/2019/05/16/everything-new-in-super-mario-maker-2 all these new additions are irrelevant because paywalled costumes are gone
Help ME out here anon, cause it seems like you're grasping at straws.
Anonymous
>>43677869 No, you're excusing laziness, despite Zelda team being more at home working with Nintendo consoles as well as delaying the game twice, shafting those who bough a WiiU for the new Zelda on top by making the "superior" version of the game the more popular one. Much less excusing porting to make more money off a failed console, while crying SS is "just a ported 3DS game" despite that clearly not being the case.
Anonymous
>>43677942 >shafting those who bough a WiiU for the new Zelda on top by making the "superior" version of the game the more popular one. What are you talking about? It's the exact same game, they ported it so it could be a launch title, not to make it "better"
>Much less excusing porting to make more money off a failed console, while crying SS is "just a ported 3DS game" despite that clearly not being the case. Big difference between a direct port that doesn't pretend it's not and claiming a game to be new and improved when it's functionally the same as the handheld game that came before it with a graphical facelift.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>NOOOOOO FUCKING /V/ERMINS! GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677869 anon if you couldn't catch that this was obvious bait in how he's criticizing the amiibo costumes getting removed but implicitly defending SwSh I don't know what to tell you.
Please don't respond to obvious bait, it makes this board a lot worse
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677215 USUM HD would've actually been pretty based, or at least better than the shit we got.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>43678002 Link's Awakening remake is inferior in every way to the 3DS 2D Zeldas by the same team, Kirby Star Allies is inferior in every way to the 3DS Kirbys and even after the "free" DLC it still has less content than those 3DS games.
Yet nobody chimped out about either of those, because people that play those games realize that price-tag doesn't magically mean a game will be bigger or better than the other, and that it refers simply to the higher costs recquired for asset production and mass-production of cartiridges and boxes.
It's just mad to hear "i-it's a 3DS game!', specially when there are 60 dollar Switch games that are simpler games than 40 dollar NDS Pokemon games.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43678840 >Yet nobody chimped out about either of those Perhaps because those games developers didn't proudly/casually mention the removal of longtime features and promise that, in their absence, we'd get better balance, visuals, and animations as a result. THAT'S why people are so critical about this compared to other games.
Anonymous
>>43676549 People like you are why society is in the state it’s in.
Settling for less, inhaling mediocre slop, and calling anyone not inhaling slop a hieratic. You are one of many literal, actual NPCs.
Anonymous
>>43677704 Doubt you did, even speedrunners can't finish the game in under 4 1/2 hours, Red can be finished in 1 1/2 hours.
You WERE able to finish Red in that time, weren't you anon?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43678933 Perhaps if you're angry the normie kid's franchise isn't doing what you want, you should find a normie kid's franchise that IS doing what you want, because as the dexit sperg-out proved, no-one outside the sphere of the manchild mafia internet zones give a fuck for their complaints.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676558 you dropped your fishing rod.
Anonymous
>>43678970 No I didn't beat it in that time, I don't try to play games as fast as possible.
Anonymous
>>43679261 And yet you bum-rushed Gen VIII......
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676549 You bought SW/SH. You have lost all rights to determine what is cringe or not.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43676525 most based take ive seen on the game.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43679387 I could've gone faster but I actually did a challenge by not dynamaxing, not using items in battle, and only using Ludicolo (because it's a good mon with a good animation)
I also purposefully lost to Hop the first time, which also added to the time. I also did many max raid battles but it was still a lower game time
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677215 >Lusamine & Lilie HD Yes please.
Anonymous
>>43676525 Didn't read. Just smelled your seething through your screen and started laughing
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43677869 >He's literally defending breath of the emptiness while complaining about the standards of others Hehehe
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>43682125 Good shill cuck