>>43684757Your title and thumbnail are misleading, I went in expecting in depth study of what make popular gendered pokemon work, instead I got a lecture on how problematic they are. The title will pull in people who are more likely to dislike the video, a more accurate title will get viewers who are more likely to subscribe to your channel and watch more videos.
Your video is not visual stimulating. You at least put pictures of pokemon up when you are talking about them, but most of the video is just you waving your hands around awkwardly.
There were a lot of pokemon that were labeled problematic that have 50/50 gender splits. You decided that certain pokemon were female, then call them out for having traits you don't think female pokemon should have. Why did you decide that those pokemon were female?
You called out nidoqueen for being "more healing, defensive" when she is a sort of strong female pokemon you are saying there should be more of. All throughout the video you put traits onto pokemon that simply aren't there. Hatterene isn't sexualized in game, but you point it out anyways.
If you are struggling so much to stretch evidence for your point, maybe you should reconsider your point.
