>>43980798>But I'm not and the filter would just remove the point of the national dex even more.Explain why no one complained in SM.
>Not that this is relevant It is, it entirely destroys one of your points. Just because it proves you wrong doesn't mean its irrelevant.
>Yes. Which is still possible in SS. If you have a clefairy from gen 3, it is still playable in gen 8.But not a Spearow.
>Not necessarily.Yes.
> You could also just store the collection on an app and just make the other pokemon available in a later game...so basically what Pokemon home is.Masuda pls, only idiots think the cloud is good.
>Because it wasn't feasible in the longterm.The "longterm" is demonstrably not now. You had a year to prove otherwise.
> Even just transferring hundreds of models from console to console takes alot of time>console to consoleYou have no idea what you're talking about
> This has been proven several timesSuch as?
>this is logical when you realize that no other games do this.Wasn't this standard practice in video games now?
>But here's the thing:no one really does care about it.Nah, they bothered to make an announcement at e3, make an app to "make up" for that AND people started massively complaining about it. Because no one cares.
>No one cared that SM had 700+ transferable mons otherwise Yes, no one minded SM did the exact thing they wanted. You complain when things go your way?
>The real question is where is the proof that people cared about the national dex pre-dexit?The entire controversy?
The fact that people still complain about no compatibility between Gen 2 and Gen 3?
The fact GF themselves went out of their way to ensure mons are transferable up to this point and considered necesary to announce ahead of time that it wont be the case anymore?
The fact that the franchise is about collecting and people who follow it collect?
The fact that the term "living dex" was even a thing in the fanbase?
