>>43990211>It's literally the whole discussion.Nope. Saying they didn't increase graphics and saying they didn't increase graphics enough are two different conversations
>Improved from what?Sun and Moon
>That doesn't prove graphics were exchanged for the dexcutWell they said ONCE that the graphics were what was exchanged so assumably it's that
>in what way?Overworld mons and tons of other QoL improvements
>such as?Raid battles
>How would a filter not achieve this?It's more difficult to properly filter 800 than 400-600
>They're the same.Not all of them. The raid battle animations for example aren't the same
>I'd need a non-vague deflecting answer to "look at it correctly".I dont know what you expect from arguing over something subjective
>>43990224>Sure, because "models are remade form scratch but also reused because that's industry standard" is an entirely cohesive point.Whataboutism
>Also, what contradictions are you even refering to?Caring about graphics
Claiming that grindy things don't count as real content
Claiming pokemon are content
