>>44008247>Gen 2an overall solid roster of some unexplored ideas from Gen 1 with general improvements - every mon is distinct and has at least one distinct thing
> Gen 3A tropically themed roster of pokemon, in theory nearly as good as Gen 2 but the shapes and coloring is starting to lean more into the "plastic toy" feel
>Gen 1A few classics but also a few filler mons, due to the limitation the details, color and other (eyes, ears, spikes) tend to be really similar which makes them a bit generic
>Gen 7A few new design ideas with a cozy theme, I dig
>Gen 6Solid, animal-like with some character but most clearly look like toys
>Gen 5Some of the worst designs have been committed here, the roster is extremely bloated and many of the mons are unnecessary. But some designs stick the landing so eventually, it ends up here.
>Gen 4Decent in theory but nearly every mon has something I would have changed about it, cross gen evolutions are the real stinkers of this roster
>Gen 8Brings nothing new, full of unfunny "joke" designs, most of them are generic animals, any potential in nearly every evo line has been squandered, Eiscue is the worst thing that has happened to the whole franchise.
To not sound overtly negative - at least it gave us Falinks and Grapploct line.
