>>44044909I've seen worse. You can be saved.
>>44044921Too much oldfaggotry
>>44044973I question Ruby and Sapphire being better than ORAS, but fair enough
>>44044991I feel personally offended by Blue being the lowest ranked of gen 1, and disagree with the leniency you give X and Y, but whatever.
>>44045021>Ruby and Sapphire over HGSS and BW>The apparent time you started playingYou're entitled to your nostalgia, I guess
>>44045793Ultra S&M may be disappointing, but they are objectively better than S&M.
>>44046264Solid choices/10
>>44046334I... have difficulty comprehending you, anon.
>>44046483Decent
>>44046678You at least have them in the same tier, but again, Ultra S&M are objectively better.I think they're too high, but that order bugs me more.
>>44046702I don't understand how you can rank HGSS and Crystal together.
Also, gen 1 that high is dubious
>>44046755>Crystal OVER HGSSWell, it's a unique take, I guess. Credit where it's due.
...and does Palkia really trigger you that much?
>>44047456See crystal hgss gripe
>>44047854See S&M and US&M gripe
Also Yellow? Yeally?
>>44048751Uh, hello, based department?
>>44048946SWSH that high makes my eye twitch
>>44052189S&M US&M gripe. otherwise good.
>>44052264Fair takes
>>44052319fair
>>44052372spitting facts with Blue, kek for Firered
>>44052419US&M shouldn't be that high. Milk toast otherwise.
