For ratings, I'm going to overlook the amount or variety of pokemon you train (as not everybody's interested in those limitations), but I will care about scarcity - one rare mon is fine, but two or more are pushing it.
>>44133561Really generic team, will forget about it the moment it exits my line of sight. As the retarded anon said, though, good luck with two pseudos and a rotom.
>>44133586I get the strong feeling you want to fuck at least one, but not all, of the pokemon on your team. Regardless, it definitely has some character, so I'll let it slide.
>>44133715Ignoring the scarcity issue, I do quite like this team - it's not in any way generic, and the picks give some life you generally don't see in most teams.
>>44133768Were it not for Greninja, this team would be one of the best non-themed teams I've seen.
>>44133831This, however, is very hot. The mons you've picked make it clear where you'd be found in the world, but you've made sure to give your team variety in typings and personality.
>>44133900Despite it being a generic "cool mons" team on paper, picking only three mons gives me much more respect for it, for some reason.
>>44133969>carbinkbased
>>44133982Like the OP, not going to remember this team the moment I look away.
>>44134080Poison isn't as inherently edgy as Steel. Most edgy poison types like Gengar can be recontextualised to be much less edgy if you have a good team composition, while mons like Skarmory will always be edgy no matter what. Edgelords generally go for "superior" types, whether it be a rare type or a powerful type, and Steel is much more rare and powerful than Poison.
