>>44224314>You have to play pokemon to be a pokemon playerThat's why BW sold
We all went out and bought it, because DPPt and HGSS had gotten a lot of us back in to the series
And then it was a huge disappointment to everyone
>Also, there's more mons than that, it's literally the gen with the most amount of mons.I mean, did you really expect me to go through them one by one and point out why each individual one is bad?
That's not true, of course. There's maybe a dozen or so I like. But if you failed 138 out of 150 times, you fucked up
>Its better that there is than that there isn't.Absolutely untrue
The #1 most offputting thing about BW is that the plot just won't fucking leave you alone
You can't ever just go to what you want to do. You always have to fucking fight Team Plasma first
Their fingerprints are on every single area in the game, but they're no more interesting or challenging than Team Rocket
For comparison, the villains in RSE are a way dumber concept, but the game isn't really about them. It's about your personal pokemon journey -exploring, catching, training, battling gym leaders.
From a plot perspective, that's what a pokemon game should be
But even if you disagree with that and think pokemon games need a "complex plot," I don't know how you can play BW and not come away from it thinking how awful the plot was
>It did that, it would have been loved in any other franchise.Have you played other franchises?
It's by far the most embarrassingly bad plot I've ever seen in a game. It's the The Last Airbender of video games.
>We never really got a complex narrative nor one that actually attempted to be complexThis is just semantics, really. I'm using "complex narrative" in a relative sense to refer to games like BW that attempt to be plot-driven rather than gens 1-4 which rely on minimal plot
