>>44336964> people liked Type:Null & SilvallyLook I don't doubt somewhere does but the line is pretty weak, Silvally's design should've merged the elements of Type: Null into a cohesive thing where instead of being this frankenstein Pokemon it cleanly mixes the fish-like tail, insectoid forelimbs and purple hexagons.
> RotomDexYou mean the annoying piece of shit that no one likes and basically took a minor Pokemon that not many people cared about into being the Gen IV equivalent of Charizard with how much shallow pandering it got?
> CynthiaYeah this one's justified, at least in BW they explain that it's basically her on vacation although even then it's weak regardless and SM was worse.
> LookerI fucking hate the ORAS and SMUSUM Lookers, they're given nothing to do and just are there because. ORAS may as well not have had him same as USUM and SM could've just been Anabel with only references to Looker.
> CyrusYou mean the part where every previous game's main antagonist returned. Also how is that Sinnoh pandering and Giovanni's return as well as the fact the group is Team Rainbow Rocket not Kanto pandering?
> Red returnsDid anyone actually get angry over this, it's at least more justified than Cynthia in SMUSUM and you got a solid battle out of it, besides who the fuck out of the main cast of SMUSUM were you going to fight anyways, a more beefed up Gladion battle, Lillie who's never even fought prior to that point, Hau?
Anyways onto the actual argument itself, a Genwunner isn't just someone who started with RB, it's specifically someone who started with those games and hates the later generations vehemently (with the possible exception of GSC). The people you're describing just started on those games, I started on Red so your argument would make me a Genwunner even though I have no strong nostalgia for those generations. So your argument effectively boils down to, this group you think are Genwunners who are in fact not Genwunners don't act like Genwunners.
