>>44634373>It is, there’s nothing more to itBut there is more to it, dumbass. If I say Charizard is a fire type, that's true, but the whole truth is that it's a fire/flying type.
If you say Gamefreak doesn't balance around 6v6, that's true, but the whole truth is that they don't balance around any format.
>It isn’t. Last time I checked there isn’t an official 6v6 formatWe're not talking about which formats are official. We're talking about which formats Gamefreak balances around.
There isn't a 6v6 format Gamefreak balances around, and there also isn't a 4v4 or 3v3 format they balance around because VGC and BSS are unbalanced.
>Because it is a cope. What is saying “GF is shit at balance” going to change about how we deal with 6v6?Because there are valid criticisms of the current 6v6 format. Gamefreak not focusing on it is not one of those criticisms because Gamefreak's focus is meaningless.
Responding to any complaint about 6v6 with "yiff yiff it's not official" isn't constructive in any way.
It implies that 6v6 is unfixable because GF isn't interested in fixing it. Which isn't true because, in case you forgot, GF wouldn't be able to fix it anyway even if they wanted to.
I look forward to seeing how you misinterpret this post.
