>>44751870>>44751884I've watched other 1 hour+ critical videos (not about Pokémon) to the end if they actually have a lot of context to cover and give valuable insight without meandering or circling around the same points.
If you need a 1 hour long video to explain why a single Pokémon does well in the meta of a game from 1999 it's a sign your script needs a lot of trimming. The most intelligent arguments can say a lot with few words; it's about mileage and not being verbose for the sake of being verbose.
