>>44772421oh does that word bother the little baby? i won't use it again then
>>44772431why did you not actually reply to me lol
>>if a pokemon doesn't move up a tier, then its not an improvement!i mean, how else are you going to show something got better
>>44772432>they were the /pol/ designated bad peoplei mean, idk, someone has poor english, you call em a spic, someone is greedy, you call em a jew, someone's butt fuck ugly and retarded, you call them a tranny. same principle
>The fact that no one uses anything below BL in that metaso not a real source. thanks
>AHAHgo back
>almost all /pol/acks are illegals from reddit.i've never been on /pol/ in my life
interesting that you know all this, though. would you like to share something?
>says the person who thought that NU matteredas far as showing that the split made pokemon worse, none of you have concretely proved me wrong so far
>>44772459>yeah bro that move that's only used 1% of the time? i-i swear it's relevant!!>>44772514>so those mons that me and the rest of "splitfags" are mentioning which either stayed OU or rose upbecause, as you said, the items and the abilities and the moves introduced. not the split.
and again, you haven't shown any of them even rising up that much. your argument fails on both accounts
