>>44967108>but dissing a source has nothing to do with anythingYes, its the constant in the fanbase.
>People diss GF literally all the timeYes, and that's not a good thing, thanks for admitting I'm right BTW.
> retconning 'official' information, because they haveIrrelevant. As people diss stuff that wasn't retconned.
> I do think they're Pokemon since it was serving my point on what I find valid assessments.So you think the Battle Maison and the Battle Tree are literally the Battle Tower?
>So no one but you brought up exactnessThis entire discussion is about exactness.
>You're too ignorant to realize this is only a topic in the first place as a counter-reaction to longstanding insistence that the difference between them matters beyond marketing,The classification exists. That it does not matter beyond marketing is irrelevant.
This, however, doesn't mean the classification does not exist.
>>44967116So they corrected themselves. Therefore, that's irrelevant.
>just don't take the truth to be that simpleIt is actually that simple for people above 6. So I guess its too complex for the pokemon fanbase.
