>>45090278>explain how the gimmick is good1. It's not a gimmick, unlike Z-Moves/Dynamax
2. They actually cared to explain its lore in detail and it was a driving force behind the whole plot of every gen 6 game
3. It gave new life to old Pokemon that were otherwise overlooked
4. For a good portion of Megas, it requires some sort of strategy instead of just mega evolving as soon as possible like a retard. Sableye, for instance, loses Prankster. So a common strategy was to get utility out of Prankster and go mega sometime afterwards. I.e, the same metric that dynamax retards were using to say that it was better somehow.
>Retcon mega rings to function like synergy burst in Pokken>regular mons get a generic 10+ stat boost and use z-moves for 3 turns>Pokemon holding a stone go mega for 3 turns>Everyone is happyThere, I even fixed it for GameFreak. Now give one objective metric of why they shouldn't do this and drop the regional gimmick bullshit? The games would be much better without them and would be more balanced if they just tweaked megas/burst as they went on. The concept of having to find new mega stones hidden away in regions means we don't have to keep retconning new gimmicks into existence that no one's ever heard of.
