>>45132022>Lol when was it ever 120 dollars before? IfBy going off the third version model so far it would have costed that much, but obviously you know that unless you're underage
>>45132029>>45132029>>IoA and CT do not constitute even a single region's worth of gameplay. According to what? Whay do you constitute as a full region-worth of content? How does Johto get away with shrunken barren routes, but not 3D ones with like 5 times the pokemon diversity?
>instead of shutting down just because you paid $90 for it and can't cope with it having been a waste of money.Not at all. I enjoyed SS more than most pokemon games. You're coping because you don't know how to quantify content.
>USUM released 1 year prior to Lets Go and was $40.Yes, but it was at the end of its console life (DS don't exist anymore).
> Inflation isn't a factor, it's the precedent for 1st party console releases.Yes because console games are valued more.
>Oh, so we're counting both versions now? No I am counting what the game would have costed if it sent the third version route.
>Same game retard. You shouldn't have to pay $30 for both games when the content is exactly the fucking same across both.Tell that to Pokemon in general. This isn't new
>DLC started with SwSh. Pokemon has always been anti-consumer, but gen 8 is where they hold the rest of the game behind a $30 paywall. That was every other Gen as well. What are you talking about?
>Without DLC, the ONLY THING TO DO after becoming champion is the Battle Tower.Yoi can say the same about Ruby and Sapphire. Also you're ignoring 90% of the content in the game because you have some autist need to have the content after the game instead of before
