>>45140256>it's not like Smash 64 was something new and N64 was a very limited platform so they couldn't do risks with it?they could add more if they wanted to if they had development time, you fucking retard.
that was the sole reason for the cut 4 in Smash 4, nothing about limitations.
>comparing a most popular pokemon poll to smash character suggestion polls is already retarded and you should feel bad about embarrassing yourself like thiswhat's retarded about a poll that didn't include duplicated votes for better and more genuine sample size?
and no, you're already fooled yourself further for moving goalposts so much about some shit picks that were unviable or never made it highly in the pollings and citing a fan poll for a fucking disney character.
a bringing up the natural inclusions on the topic of requested characters on top of that to shift the topic.
