>>45159671>dismissing it with buzzwords is a low iq move. I didn’t dismiss it with buzzwords, I dismissed based on what was presented. With the food analogy you used you’re being served something detrimental to your health, in Pokemon you’re essentially just being given a starting weapon to which you can either like or dislike.
>we're the consumers, if we're paying money for something and don't like what we consider a significant part of it then we can complain Sure you can complain, but you can complain about anything regarding the product. Getting upset over a design is something trivial at fucking best. And anyone’s praising of the mons is just as valid as the complaints about them.
>clearly many people do consider it significant and would rather be given a starter that they want to keepThen keep it or don’t. Problem with this argument is that it applies to every starter not just the ones you dislike.
>people have been expected to be fond of and hold onto their starter pokemon for the whole game since the beginning of the franchiseAgain, keep it or don’t. There are people who aren’t fond of certain starter sets both new and old. This isn’t some special or unique case that somehow has more weight now because you don’t like this specific set. Keep the damn thing or move on and pick something else.
