>>45286064And all of it's 2d depictions which came out FIRST have it's flames out and purrloin on all 4's
>Except for the part where 2D sprites were literal abstraction and NOT meant to be what the Pokemon was doing at all times. Do you REALLY think the pokemon were fucking making that pose all the time during battle? Those were clearly supposed to be action shots or, again, abstractions of what they are. Unless you think Regigigas is ACTUALLY supposed to be pulling a Vegeta 24/7 due to its Gen 4 sprites.Yeah no, we aren't talking about regigigas, we are talking about Metagross also your "muh abstraction" bullshit doesn't fly either you're literally saying
>It was introduced giving off this image and personality but because it wasn't 3d it doesn't count.Like I said at the beginning. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
No they do not get a pass because it's just as ridiculous to have ferro hanging off of nothing in battle.
>Again, why does Ferro need to do that to fight? The fish Pokemon NEED to swim to fight, Ferro doesn't need to latch on something.It doesn't need to lach onto anything to fight and I was never arguing that either. I said it looked better with that idle pose, stay on track.
>B-b-but your proof doesn't count because it destroys my narrative!No, it doesn't count because the 3D anims were clearly not what the mons was doing naturally.
>B-b-but your proof doesn't count because it destroys my narrative>You haven't properly refuted any of my arguments and are literally just sayingLet's see
You say metagross has been stomping in an idle before
>I argue that 2D was an obvious abstraction, and it was only on instance in a game notorious for misrepping monsSeems pretty solid to me. anyways, I have something I need to be doing right now, so leave a reply and I'll get back to you later.
So in other words you don't actually have an argument other than your stupid headcannon.
