>>45353483I’ve no reason to even believe you aren’t the same anon from the other day. If you wanted to show how “bad” something was you’d actually illustrate that through your words and not some low effort bait image. Not mention if I’m to assume the second post within that thread (
>>45351751) is also you, that shows me that you seem more interested in lowering the quality of the board through meaningless shitposting than having any actual discussion.
