>>45505141> NatDex has more dedicated & passionate fansThen the feature is less niche than customization
>And there's reason to believe that since they backpedaled on their idea of customization being Kalos-only, meanwhile there's no indication that they're bringing back the remaining cut mons.The problem is that there are more factors than ONLY the fact GF brought one back and not the other. Ultimately, while customization is liked (even probably by people who complete the dex) you can't sell home suscriptions or sell dlc based on those so there's less benefit on cutting customization than there is on cutting the dex, not to mention we're just one game in the new policy so of course we wont see that being reversed now. Regarding the dexcut, we're still at an ORAS-like situation so bringing up that there are no signs of the dex coming back doesn't mean much.
Finally, there's the more important fact that the lack of customization didn't seem important enough to interrupt a main PR push like the e3 while the dexcut was.
>Do you really not know the difference between "cares about collecting" and "cares about collecting every single thing"?One eventually leads into the other. I'm on normie facebook groups about SWSH, people DO try to fill their dexes(the ones in the game anyways)
>Bringing up POGO is a hilarious counter-example because there's so many limited-time variants of mons, and completing the dex is a herculean effort that almost no one has done because of the sheer amount of irl money you'd need to spend if you don't cheat.If filling the dex was easy then it wouldn't be the main attractive you idiot. It was there before battling.
