>>45834997>You doubting if two of the three given definitions are ones that people use is exemplifying the issue, anon.Hardly. Dictionaries as a matter of course contain archaic usage. Online dictionaries on the other hand are also prone to edge-case usages, something cited from a magazine or blog or the like.
>It does not also(sic) do soYour argument is that tumblr and most people use it the way tomboy was once used, and apply it to straight women. You essentially have no evidence of this argument, so I'd have to take you on your word. I don't.
>Second person in this article is explicitly not a lesbianShe claims she's not straight or a woman. She says she's queer, which is used in many ways, either for someone who is unsure of their sexuality, someone who is unsure of her gender identity, or someone who is attracted to things outside of male/female (though other terms are popular for that now.) She's part of that LGBT complex of insanity. How exactly is this a normal, straight woman? I think she's simply insane, you would agree with her that she's queer and thus not straight (or cis depending on what she means.)
>I identify as trans-masculine, masculine-of-center, masc, butch, and non-binarySee? I don't know how you crazies distinguish 'trans-masculine' from being simply a transman, but by saying she's non-binary she is specifically claiming she's not a man or a woman in respect to gender.
>It's a beauty that embodies same-sex and queer desire, is inescapably dyke camp, and is largely missing from mainstream media.This line from your article stands out to me because it specifically notes how butch is associated with LGBT period.
>Look up articles for butch manAm I gonna find more weird obscure internet magazines?
