>>45943500The """"""point"""""" is a reference to early paleontologists fucking up mounts and naming species based on chimeric skeletons, if they introduced the full forms of these fossils then it would just drive in the point. All it does is make the most modern region look like it's stuck in the 1800s research wise.
Also, it just plain does not make sense with how fossils are resurrected in other regions, every other region seems to take DNA from the fossil provided to give you the individual (Just look at the old amber and the other fragmentary fossils we have gotten in the past), you wouldn't get half and halves from doing that.
In other words, Galar just spits on everything that came before it, doesn't it?
