>>45991636Ah, I misread you. But you're still going in the same direction. The claim that the people of the UK can't be indigenous because they received migrants.
As I said before: 99% white and 1% Aboriginal is considered validly indigenous.
Well in the UK most of them are like 99% original Briton and 1% Scandi or otherwise but you're told to call them complete mongrels.
Why do you think that is?
Political reasons: indigenous people are entitled to protections under international law such as not being mixed out of existence by mass immigration and having their sacred sites bulldozed for apartment blocks.
They don't want anyone in the UK to have this trump card because it's a first world country and so a very desirable place to live.