>>46269415Nah he is right, fact is eventually we will have so much advancements, the need to advance won't exist anymore.
Video quality for example, is on the verge of becoming too good for the human eye to detect a difference. At this point there will just be no need, no demand, for it to be improved, so it won't be done commercially. Research scientists and the cultist morons who obsess over "2.0 dude, 8K bro" will probably still guarantee some improvements for the sake of it though but it definitely won't be as big.
This guy
>>46270707 is right, we are still pretty far from that point and none of us living will likely see it happen.
