[36 / 6 / ?]
Quoted By: >>46407228 >>46407268 >>46407275 >>46407317 >>46407328 >>46407340 >>46407364 >>46407640 >>46407942 >>46408025 >>46408066 >>46408116 >>46408134 >>46408136 >>46408155
Which fans have the worst cope
Gen 1
>flaws are excused because of their JRPG design philosophy
Gen 2
>It is a sequel and doesnt have to stand on its own.
>Gen 2 pokemon are rare to find to make the player feel like they're discovering new species.
Gen 3
>? not a Hoenbab. I just dont see hoennfags defend their games.
Gen 4
>The lack of fire types makes it more difficult
>The slowness of the Hp bar makes battles more intense
>Your pokemon dont need 4 moves. It makes it more difficult
Gen 5
>The sprite animations make the pokemon more lively than previous gens.
>it looks great on the ds.
Gen 6
>The online makes up for the lack of post-game
Gen 7
>The story was worth it
>The game opens up after the first island
Gen 8
>but the QOL
>the exp share makes training wild pokemon easier and not discouraging.
>only the wild area looks bad
Gen 1
>flaws are excused because of their JRPG design philosophy
Gen 2
>It is a sequel and doesnt have to stand on its own.
>Gen 2 pokemon are rare to find to make the player feel like they're discovering new species.
Gen 3
>? not a Hoenbab. I just dont see hoennfags defend their games.
Gen 4
>The lack of fire types makes it more difficult
>The slowness of the Hp bar makes battles more intense
>Your pokemon dont need 4 moves. It makes it more difficult
Gen 5
>The sprite animations make the pokemon more lively than previous gens.
>it looks great on the ds.
Gen 6
>The online makes up for the lack of post-game
Gen 7
>The story was worth it
>The game opens up after the first island
Gen 8
>but the QOL
>the exp share makes training wild pokemon easier and not discouraging.
>only the wild area looks bad
