>>46479798Agreed the design looks weird but the quality is actually surprisingly good
>>46479805If I were selling them I wouldn't have described them in nm/m, and the pictures didn't show any of the flaws. That said they're still pretty decent shape, especially in a binder, and shipping it back seems like a hassle. I think asking for a partial refund seems reasonable but I dont know how common that is, never bought cards before that weren't as pictured/advertised, aside from shit ass trollandtoad back in the day. Don't want to me difficult to work with, and I can tell the seller is just an average person selling their cards so it's not like some vendor that should know better. Maybe 25% off would be fair?
