>>46516147Again - I don't doubt Jews are behind some massively shady shit.
However, if Jews were the ones in control, why would we know about them being exiled? Why would we even be allowed to hate them? And not just in a 'antisemitism isn't acceptable' way why would it even be considered acceptable among fringe groups with guns and weaponry? Why would the concept of criticism against Jews even be slightly in the peripheral of the Overton Window?
The true enemy does not want to be seen, does not want to be identified, does not want to be heard. The only reason I likely am not being gunned down is because I can't name names. They would not loudly proclaim a country for their own and be part of one of the most controversial border/occupation conflicts in all of modern history. They would not allow any dissent at all against something as damaging as the Holocaust: say the Holocaust isn't real. You're allowed to do that, you're allowed to say that, you're allowed to type that, you're allowed to think that, you're not pissing off the true enemy. People will think you're a piece of shit, but you won't be erased. The Holocaust wouldn't even happen to the true enemy in the first place.
I'm not excusing any one's group's actions, but antisemitism in the way it's followed on /pol/ and elsewhere is pretty clearly the result of plants and setting up an obvious scapegoat. Hate the Jews all you want, but they are not what we should be fighting.
As long as a known group is the 'true enemy', it can't be an unknown group. Once you understand that, you understand how brutally effective their tactics are. It can be Jews, it can be Trump, it can be J.K. Rowling, it can be anyone 'known'.
