>>46600808>CharizardAlready off to a great start. Impossibly based and redpilled
>NinetalesI think Ninetales is fine as just a pure Fire-Type, but I wouldn't lose sleep over it being dualtyped
>GolduckThis is just reversing Game Freak's retarded mistake. It's shocking Golduck isn't already Psychic
>Farfetch'dWhile I don't agree with Farfetch'd itself being Fighting/Flying, I think it should get a non-regional evolution with this typing
>MeganiumI don't agree with this, but it could be interesting if it had Triage + Draining Kiss
>FeraligatrNothing about Feraligatr is inherently evil. It's just a crocodile
>NoctowlIt's fine as just a Normal/Flying-Type
>AmpharosThis is also based. Ampharos's Japanese name aludes to it being a Dragon-Type + it's Mega was Dragon, so why not it's base form?
>MisdreavusI'm neutral on this change. Not totally for it, or against it
>SceptileIf base Sceptile has Lighningrod, it also shouldn't be Grass/Dragon, imo. Lighningrod on a Grass/Dragon-Type is kind of a shitty ability
>MasquerainBug/Flying is fine on it. Nothing about Masquerain suggests it should be Water
>Volbeat/IllumiseThey don't use electricity/fairy magic shits, so they shoouldn't be these types. The justificaiton is fairly weak, imo
>FlygonIt's a desert dragon that has sand powers, it should keep it's Ground/Dragon typing. I know it gets outclassed by Garchomp, but it's just more fitting. Flygon just needs to have something to set it apart from Garchomp
>AltariaIt's fine as a Dragon/Flying-Type. All cloud-based Pokemon are Flying-Type in some way, so it makes no sense to remove it's Flying-Type
>SeviperIt's just a snake. Nothing evil about it
>MiloticDrayano changed Milotic to be Water/Fairy, but not Gyarados to be Water/Dragon? That's bullshit
>GlalieSure, I can get down with this. It already says in Glalie's dexentries that its madeof rock.This would just giveGlalie a moreuseful offensive typing, at the cost of instadying to Mach Punchs from Machops
cont.
