>>46652068>Again the game allows you to breed them, are the games pedo simulators now? Do you recognize the difference between being attracted to a Pokemon with child-like proportions and thus being associated with a broader group of sexual deviants as opposed to an abstract Pokemon generation system? What the fuck
>And as I said super strict places like reddit, which don't even allow aged up versions of underaged human characters, have no problem with these....and cubs (furry children) have long been a loophole on sites like Reddit for the "no loli" rule and until today are a loophole in many countries' jurisdictions for virtual CP. Appealing to the perception of this kind of art doesn't even serve as a significant indicator for whether it's something that pedophiles really enjoy or not.
I am not even him, but you're just being bad faith with every argument you have given.
I don't even care about pedos or lolifags, they can do whatever they want, but fuck you're stupid and I noticed that most people who defend loli shit are equally dumb when it comes to argumentation.
