>>46742912>I didn't say it was romanticYou were definitely implying that a Gardevoir being protective means that she's in love with her trainer.
>There's nothing in official canon that states what gardevoir are to gallade and vice versaIt's called context clues, anon. It is not a stretch to say that two Pokemon of the same species would be romantically interested and sexually attracted to each other.
>show anywhere in official canonI could say the exact same to yours.
>generally focuses on the human relationships because it's more intriguingAgain, that does not in any way imply romance.
