>>46756886These design serve no artistic or creative value. Neither of these designs do any particularly good job at conveying what style of battler these mons are supposed to be.
Imagine if the newer designs came out during the sprite era, how would you know Tsareena is a physical attacker based on design alone? How would you know Pheromosa was a fast cannon? How can you justify Salazzle being a special attacker based on it's design?
Sure they do a good job at conveying theyre types. (Maybe besides Pheromosa) But most of these feel like they were created for sole purpose of being fapbait. There's nothing deeper or intrinsically monstrous about then besides "sexy rabbit" or "sexy fruit." These are perfect examples of "drawing a woman and putting an animal head on it." These designs are too sexualized as well.
