>>46965754>In case you missed it, they spent the entirety of Sword telling the MC "you're a kid, just concentrate on the gym challenge".Just because you play as a kid, doesn't mean it's "just for kids"
>And yet you still squeal like a stuck pig, thinking by squealing, you'll prove yourself worth a fuck to the devs.And yet if they straight up said "we don't care for adults" they would lose half of their fanbase.
>Nah, as they proved with Dexit , they don't give a shit for manchildren, but the KIDS didn't buy in as expected.Imagine thinking every normal person who is an adult, and interested in a virtual catching series is a dumb manchild incel, at this point you are just a projecting cynical retard,
of course they won't cater to manchildren because they will complain no matter what, but that doesn't mean they won't focus on the adults either. (There are normal adults that play pokemon, shocker I know. There is a difference between manchildren, and adults within the pokemon franchise, crazy right?) So, stop gatekeeping, and realize that gatekeeping won't help you get gen 9 any faster, nor does it make you entitled to make it happen. You are basically saying game devs can't try anything different. It has nothing to do with your big mean manchild boogeymen you keep schizoiding about.
>Less sales due to the older-focused plot (even with the "can't get lost" design of the map) meant they were going to return to what sells.Yet you forget that there are both adult, and child consumers, and including the adults equals more sales. They don't exclude or gatekeep because that's a loss in money.
>>46965768Again, they make different games for different audiences, they did XD, and colleseum, along with the gen 1 remakes in gen 3 to cater to older audiences remember.
>>46965776>Thinking a game is all about pretty pictures, and not the contentBrainlet
