>>47068829Depends a bit on experience, obviously. A good bj is a fucking religious experience, a bad/mediocre one is okay, generally worse than an equally unskilled handjob, but if there's earnestness and love there, it's worth it.
The upfront experience is overwhelming either way. It's by far the most initially inviting hole, it's warm, and soft, and moist, and it seriously kinda feels like the edges of your nerves are dissociating, you don't really feel where your cock stops. There are elements of anal that peaks higher here, but overall, oral is the winner. As you acclimate to the feeling, experience starts to make the difference. Good oral draws out that feeling by preventing you from ever fully adjusting to the feeling, but does it smoothly and without jarring transition, whether that be through suction, pressure or massages with the tongue, or cheek. Done well, that feeling of overwhelming sensation sticks for a very long time, and you're never really expecting any particular round of physical, conditional, or external stimulation. Bad ones tend to take "sucking cock" too literally, and just start giving a dick hickey, which isn't horrible, but pretty quickly just feels like a dick hickey.
Bad bjs, you feel an orgasm build, then release, not unlike just getting a handjob. Good ones, it just... emerges, and flows until it runs out of energy. Honestly, the only thing even close to the feeling is a prostate orgasm.
Also, it is absolutely, positively essential to cum inside. It breaks the feeling to pull out, while continuing to get mild stimulation through ejaculation rides out the orgasm into a feeling frankly unmatched by anything else the penis can feel. Personal fetishes for where the cum goes aside, this is pure pragmaticism; respect the sacrifice being made if someone accepts to abstain from this more complete feeling that is nearly impossible to get anywhere else, without a prostate orgasm.
A good bj is about the journey, not the destination.