>>47111054Furfags co-opted this franchise and made the narrative where Pokemon is STRICTLY based around zoo animals, and not what Taijiri always meant it to be; a Japanese analog to Dungeons & Dragons. That means creatures that run the gamut from mimicks to otherwordly beings, not just something on 4 legs with fur that you can fuck.
Every time a based Pokemon design like Klingkland, or Palossand, or Stonjourner makes itself known, its a salient reminder and a point of unnecessary contention by these normalfag furry fucks. You don't like the design? That's fine. But don't start waging an eternal butthurt campaign for decades with the pretense that "MURR HURR THIS IS NOT WHAT POKEMON IS ABOUT!!!!".
