>>47130112soulless
>>47130299very nice, anon!
>>47130313yeah I was holding out for one from one of the non-nintendo power distributions that come with the envelope but none popped up under $1k for months on end (I doubt most of those actually sell) and the one I paid for mine was about $300AUD including shipping, which while being very fucking expensive for a piece of card no matter how rare is also at least $150 under the other prices I was seeing on eBay and the like. If you do want to get either of those one day I'd suggest looking for a Pokémon collectors group on social media or checking
reddit for the items, people surprisingly end up pricing it lower than what you find in areas not dedicated to collecting. I guess because collectors are more likely to know how long it'll take to sell at higher prices vs. the idiots who throw everything up higher and higher because that's what they see other idiots pricing their stuff at? idk
>>47130331is that the TCG PC game with horrible CGI? hell yeah, always wanted to play it for novelty factor but apparently it doesn't run on post-XP systems even with compatibility mode although that might be misinfo
