>>47139838>Liking nu-pokemon in any capacity is feces gargling taste>Immediately starts praising Rillaboom>Can't comprehend liking one(1) of the 88+ pokemon from gen 8 or an earlier gen depending on inevitable goalpost movingWow, it's almost like you don't know what you're talking about and it's not worth wasting my time convincing you. Also, since you lack reading comprehension in addition to vocabulary, let me hammer it in.
I'm not defending Primarina.
You're apparently not capable of handling your end of the argument, so I'll just point out that you could have said things like sounds and bubbles don't go together as a design element, its hair beads coming apart and together are dumb, it's not able to move on land like the other starters, dumb clothes accentuating its jobmon problem. But no, keep targeting the trans boogeyman. Very convincing. Good job, Mr. """"Apt descriptions."""""
The bland, predictable, unoriginal, recycled, waste of potential you know as Rillaboom that you don't know how to defend because you only know how to deflect is garbage. Inteleon provokes a modicum of thought and apparently it provokes you too, so that's more than you can say for Rillaboom. You clearly don't know how discourse between normal people works. Get off the bandwagon and go outside.
>>47139889>This rando agreeing with 2 of my starter opinions is irrefutable evidence>/threading yourself in all but name>Still can't give a single reason why any grass starter is goodI'm going to assume you're talking about Swampert since vocabulary clearly isn't your strong suit and no, Chesnaught's not even the worst grass starter, let alone better than Swampert. I've done more than my fair share of shitting on grass starters and I'm not interested in more. You're clearly interested in recycling same non-argument, but I'm not. Check your shit taste at the door, you're not worth the dirt on my shoe. You somehow made a friend out of all of this garbage. Good for you, shitstain.
