>>47201658I like it, but the heels are overdone. Either remove 'em outright, or lower 'em by at least half.
>>47201660Interesting, but the skates are just kinda *bam* there. I think they could really do with some stylizing.
Also, there's some odd dimensionality with the hat from the front. Everywhere else, there is clear distance between the head and hat, head on, you'd be forgiven for thinking it was a bonnet.
>>47201666I dig the overall theming and style, but question the choice of headband. It is a very "loud" accessory, but roses seem pretty far away from the rest of her design.
>>47201673I dig it, no complaints. Only comment is that the hat looks way better angled "bill down" slightly is in the far right pic than it does completely level.
Maybe some scuff on one of her knees itself, or maybe an elbow? Really show that these rips in her pants aren't because she's making a fashion statement, but because she really hits the pavement now and again.
>>47201682Kinda over-the-top and loud, needs some refinement. Right now, I feel like it's a bit caught between cute and punk, without embracing cutepunk, if that makes sense. Either shift more towards cutepunk, or make her less cute and lean more into punk.
100% dig the top, though, whatever you do, keep that.
The camera feels very "there" and needs more incorporation.
>>47201691I love the feel of this one, but it's not quite there. I'm not sure what the markings on her hair are supposed to be. I like the design on the pants, but feel like they shouldn't be so "genie" looking, it's oversell. Maybe cut the puff at the knee, and have a more normal fit from there to the bottom? Maybe go for some bellbottoms? I dunno, spitballing here. Important part, is that the pants are drawing a lot of attention.
>>47202160Love this one, it's perfect. Simple, but tells you a lot.
My only suggestion, make a visible sock fold/roll at the top.
Overall, I approve. Good shit.
