>>47236765>literally a no uIt was neither literal or even close to it, unlike what you did.
>attacking the character of the comeback without actually addressing its contentThat's ad-hominem, imbecile, and it wasn't so. It called you out on making a stupid remark for a stupid reason. And no, you can't simply pretend it wasn't stupid if no one bothers to explain the obvious, fuck you. The only one you fool is yourself.
All you do is dig yourself deeper. Wanna be a smartass? Trying being smart first.