>>47457320>But it's a fist of fire, by your definition, it doesn't need to make contact to deal damage right?Yes, but the attack is defined primarily by the aura. If you miss the attack, you're not doing damage. But yes, I suppose you could 'miss the punch and land the aura' but that seems to be what happens in most cases anyways, as the punches never actually land, just the aura.
>>47457338>The animation is an abstractionAbstraction, abstraction, abstraction. You love that word. Can you please show proof that's what the move is supposed to be, when even the anime confirms it's meant to be energy jaws of darkness?
>AutismYou don't understand how private property works. Private property, largely defined by Marxian thinkers, is, in layman's terms, when somebody who owns land does not work on it but still maintains a profit by it because they receive labor value from it. This is how corporations maintain a rate of profit in the real world.
This is not the case in Pokemon, where labor value does not seem to even exist, and wealthy investors like Steven's dad or Lusamine don't actually seem to own anything, and yet it clearly possesses no central power (despite police existing), and yet clearly it is not an anarcho-communist or anarcho-syndicalist society. This isn't getting into how the economy can be manipulated in several different ways to absolutely zero adverse effects, supply and demand are completely damned.
>they're an abstraction representationThe square cube law doesn't exist in Pokemon, or something like Groudon would collapse under its own weight.
So now it's on you to show that laws in Pokemon are generally the same as the real world when that isn't the case.
>>47457358That implies the energy fangs are the norm for Bite and the regular bites are reactionary 'normal' attacks, though.
