>>47556594Thanks! I was reading a booklet for Pokémon tabletop and it was interesting seeing ways to flavor a type specialist and I was inspired
>Steel typeWhat makes them distinct from rock types besides being better? I imagine they're both tough, sturdy and focus on defenses and tanking hits in battle and generally stubborn personality. What's something that rock can do that steel doesn't?
>>47556607I like to imagine Normal type trainers are really into versatility and adaptability. They can be almost as brutal as fighting types or as fast as electric types but they're "easier" to take care off.
>BugsBugs are "weird." I'm not even sure what the mentality of a bug type trainer in battle would be, but they'd definitely be well versed in complicated stuff?
>>47556631We just need more calm headed fire types
>>47556637To be fair, this is a common case of "lore =/= in practice". Red's theme isn't meta at all but he's basically considered one of the best trainers period. I'd imagine an anon with a meta team from OU pushed into a real life Pokémon battle wouldn't actually do as well as the numbers would say.
This thread is all just headcanon and speculation anyways