>>47605682>>47605785I don’t see anything wrong here. Sometimes they feed them people food other times they don’t. But also some of you get too fixated on floor eating, which varies, to notice that in the bottom one they’re eating their own food out of Pokémon bowls with no utensils, compare that to what the humans are eating.
>>47606068That doesn’t mean that the makers of Pokémon don’t pet code the Pokémon themselves. It goes beyond just food but also other critical things like interaction with your Pokémon. There, as I have said many times, a good reason that in the games Pokémon toys resemble real life pet toys. It’s the small subtle stuff that really drives home that Pokémon are your pets except magical and fantastical. Even their whole depiction as wild creatures has a closer parallel to real animals than anything else. It’s not 1:1 but the general feeling is there. This is what New Pokémon Snap capitalized on and a major reason the Pokémon were almost all given more real animal cries than fantasy ones. As I have said many times it’s very telling when even something like Gardevor, who has far as I know doesn’t have a real world parallel, is made to sound like a bird. This are the signs that all point what kind of place Pokémon have within their own universe. And I stress that they’re never 1:1 obviously but I also implore you to actually watch cartoons if your whole argument rests that they don’t behave like the real life counterparts to a T. Just off the way they’re treated and presented is enough for normal people to pick up on this. For people who want to molest them it’s harder to accept this because they don’t want to imagine themselves molesting creatures that are treated like cartoons dogs.
