[19 / 3 / ?]
Quoted By: >>47624130 >>47624139 >>47624194 >>47624242 >>47624484 >>47625027
I hate these things so much. Nothing about their concept even makes sense. They're supposed to be a joke about the terrible reconstructions of the past, but they do an awful job of parodying that. Those terrible reconstructions may have been horribly wrong, but they had at least some logic to them. They weren't just clearly unrelated animals stapled to each other with upside down heads and tiny parts beside massive ones. If they had actually been true to some of the errors made and featured outdated dinosaur ideas or were based on actual examples they might have been great fossils, but as is they 're nothing more than shitty looking abominations.
Just imagine how much soul a Richard Owen inspired Iguanodon would have had, or a water type sauropod based on the idea that they had to live in water to support their weight. Really the possibilities are endless, and any of them would have been better than "hurr durr let's stick unrelated body parts randomly together because it'll be quirky and random!!111!!"
Just imagine how much soul a Richard Owen inspired Iguanodon would have had, or a water type sauropod based on the idea that they had to live in water to support their weight. Really the possibilities are endless, and any of them would have been better than "hurr durr let's stick unrelated body parts randomly together because it'll be quirky and random!!111!!"