[60 / 15 / ?]
So there was a Pokemon Mystery Dungeon Discord server I was on that had an unusually high amount of people who also liked diapers in it, myself included. Counting myself, I would come to learn that 7 of the very active server members were diaper fetishists. And I can count there being 21 active members who I spoke and interacted with (again, counting myself). So that means that 1/3rd of the active members of the server liked diapers. I originally guessed it was very low, only like 1% of Pokemon fans are diaper fetishists. However, with this server existing, that casts serious doubt that that is the rate. However, as mentioned, this server had an abnormally high amount and shouldn't be taken as an average. But it did inspire me to try and calculate the probability. So first of all, when doing some probability calculations, I decided I shouldn't count myself. This is because it would be literally impossible for me to be in a server without diaper fetishists if I was counting myself, even if the server only had 3 members. So that leaves the question as being: that leaves the question as being: > "What are the odds that 6 people like diapers, among 20 active members, if someone has a 1% chance of liking diapers?" So I decided to write a Java program to solve this question. Pic related, it is the program. This program runs simulations that effectively roll dice to answer that question. It will run the simulation 1000 times and count the number of successful results (that is, a server that does have 6 or more members that like diapers among the 20 members). This was inspired off of the simulations people made to test the odds of Dream getting as many ender pearls and blaze rods as he was, which proved it was mathematically impossible for him to get that high of rates. What I found is that it is mathematically impossible for a server like that to exist if the chance of someone in the PMD community liking diapers is 1%. [Cont.]
Anonymous
Anonymous
I also went one step further and would run the program five times for each number, taking the average among those results. This makes it so I'm effectively running 5000 simulations instead of just 1000, for extra accuracy. The summary of the results are as follows: The odds of 6 or more members liking diapers among 20 active members if the odds of someone liking diapers is 5% is: Less than 0.01% The odds of 6 or more members liking diapers among 20 active members if the odds of someone liking diapers is 10% is: 1.28% The odds of 6 or more members liking diapers among 20 active members if the odds of someone liking diapers is 15% is: 7.14% The odds of 6 or more members liking diapers among 20 active members if the odds of someone liking diapers is 20% is: 19.12% Now, there are some problems with this. Namely that I am going off of anecdotal evidence. It's very possible there were more than 20 active members on the server, but I didn't remember them as well (while I would remember someone who did like diapers more easily). So I can't say this is too accurate, and I decided to also run some simulations with 25 members on the server instead of just 20. So because of that, my ultimate conclusion is that I can say for certainty that it is above 5%, but I doubt it's 15% or higher. So I'm guessing it is a 10% chance.
Anonymous
>>47850055 Put me in the screencap
Anonymous
2 more things to note: 1. I was only counting members I had a personal relationship with and knew in order to get that "20 active members" numbers. There were also 2 members who I didn't really know all that well, but later found out they liked diapers when I saw them on another server. So that should prove there was more accuracy in this as there were also "inactive" members who liked them as well, I'm not cherry picking the only group of people on the server who could have the interest. 2. The server as comprised of almost entirely boys, and I've noticed that there seems to be more boys who like diapers then girls who like diapers around. So now I believe the 10% statistic only applies to males.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
what the fuck, anon?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 For your next project may I recommend comparing the tastes of various household solvents.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 >Pokemon Mystery Dungeon >diapers The jokes write themselves at this point, you’re making it too easy.
Anonymous
>>47850059 >>47850064 >Platshit Games >Boys' Club >Cringe Pick three.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 This is what happens when actual autist try to be normal. They end up regurgitating a post like this. You’re actually mentally ill Op
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 So what's next? Are you going to gather data in other Pokemon communities? Data for other fetishes?
Anonymous
>>47850055 Wait. you did it experimentally? Surely there's a formula for working probabilities like that out?
Anonymous
>>47850087 What does this post even mean?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 Unironically better than most threads here
Anonymous
Anonymous
Diaperfags are fucking disgusting but this sort of absurd unironic dedication to autism is what I love to see from /vp/. Bravo. There’s probably some study out there that sought to discover the percentage of diaperfags within the general population. You could probably incorporate that into your research and compare it to the calculated likelihood of being a diaperfag within the PMD community.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 First of all you're a fucking creep and loser. Seriously get some help.
Second the statistic you are concerned with is from the binomial distribution. The probability mass function states that the probability of an event with a 1% chance of occurring exactly 6 times out of 20 is calculated by:
(20 C 6) * 0.01^6 * 0.99^14 =~ 3*10^-8 < 0.000001, basically 0
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850120 PMDfags will never recover from this.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
This is pure and sheer autism OP, lose your iPod ASAP
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>PMD padded men's diapers?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 i'm scared bros
Anonymous
>>47850055 Bruh who da hell has time for this shit? Lmao
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850273 people with diaper fetishes apparently
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 >>47850062 Interesting stuff, but you forgot to account for bias OP.
Think about how much more likely a discord user is to be a diaper fetishist than a normal functioning pokemon enthusiast. The difference is astronomical.
Ultimately what I say doesn't matter to you because this is all just cope to convince yourself that diaper fetishists are normal though.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I am aware that there are mathematical ways to calculate this and I didn't need to simulate this. I just chose to simulate this because I wanted to practice my programming. I even got this converted into a function that I can easily implement into future programs.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 Or maybe the Discord is known as diaper friendly and attracted people there? You're acting like every person in there is 100% random when there are more reasons at stake.
Your method is flawed, go back to Community College Statistics 101.
Anonymous
Legitimately one of the most autistic and degenerate threads to have ever graced this board. I think this might top Duskull Grandma.
Anonymous
>>47851098 not really, all he really did was make a quick shitty program in java. the premise behind it is retarded, but is probably made up anyway.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47851120 >>47851098 It's not even accurate statistics. It's just nonsense.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>47850055 A genuinely interesting experiment, OP.
If we could expand this to a bigger server, imagine the data we could extra date we could extract.
This is the power of weaponized autism.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Mother of god.
Anonymous
>>47851209 Fuck off, groomer. Hope you get sepsis from shitting yourself and wallowing around in your own diaper filth.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47851178 This is what happens when you outlaw kink shaming.
Anonymous
>>47851367 seethe for me tranny, at least I can get off without destructive surgery :)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 i'm curious how you even came to know that these people had a diaper fetish.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47851536 How much is rent in your head? Oh, it’s free?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 >Post your own original research >Call it "interesting" The gaul of this diaperfag.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850097 There is, and OP is a fag.
Also one server having an unusually high rate of degenerates isn't enough data to draw his conclusions. With the millions of discord servers it's rather probable that one will hit that 0.01% chance of having 6/20 degens.
Anonymous
>>47851098 >I think this might top Duskull Grandma. haven't visited this board for a while, what's that?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47852005 A guy showing his grandmas corpse (inside a funeral casket) his dusklops
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47851178 Nintendo hired a spook to get PMD fans to stop asking for a PMD sequel. This is the method the spook is employing: making all PMD fans appear to be degenerate diaperfags, stifling all others from asking again.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850100 You need high iq
Anonymous
Quoted By:
legendary thread
Anonymous
Quoted By:
please can we fucking delete this board man put it out of its misery
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 This isn't how statistics work at all
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 PMD is for furfags due to being about self-inserting as a Pokemon. Furfags groomed teenage diaperfags during the early-mid 00s (hell, they probably still do) due to them being a vulnerable minority who wouldn’t be able to speak out about it. Thus, PMD communities will have babyfurs in them. Simple as that.
Anonymous
>>47850087 In English please
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47852950 Platshit is in English, keep crying platinumcuck.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Any Blueberry inflation connoisseurs here?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
absolutely based
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 >discord >diapers >coding Ask me how I know you're a tranny
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>47850055 i don't understand how you get to this stage in life