>>47996797>pokemon is the only one that can't figure out how to either be universally appealing by making all the content good quality so older people don't feel like they're being lectured by a five year old, or add a couple features to accommodate people who've played any game before in their lifeThey don't HAVE to care, it the point, you obtuse little drip. They have your peers, drones born into the brand, who'll buy in, the normies on a nostalgia buzz or checking in, like they do every once in a while and they have a brand-new set of kid eyes every year, as kids grow into the brand and become aware of it and even a few like me, too old for the target audience on its launch 25 years ago, but who still found themselves going along for the ride anyway.
You're irrelevant, a waste of devhours and money, when doing what they do sells as it does anyway. It's too tarred with the kiddy brand brush, to significantly increase its drawing power by changing, so why fucking bother?
