>>48108677Every time you post, you're showing exactly why no one took us seriously.
Who started the name-calling? Doesn't fucking matter, if you wanted to be taken seriously you shouldn't have chimped out the way you did. "They started it" is what literal children say. Plus, most of what BBND is remembered for now is the name-calling, so thanks for that. Oh, and bugs in anus didn't help, either.
I will agree that the anti-BBND movement had more alarmingly unstable people on its side, like the guy who put a hole in his wall and that anime profile pic Twitter guy who said he wanted to kill us.
On another point, where do you get off saying "prove you can disagree without being a shill"? That's beyond condesending, and so were the most vocal people of the movement, which is exactly why it failed. People didn't mind not having all the pokemon and you refused to accept it, because you dismissed it, thinking it wasn't a legitimate opinion.
I got involved with BBND in the early days and while some of us were drafting letters like Joe did (the less you bring him up, the better, btw, just a tip) in order to list out what our concerns were, especially with how predatory/anti-consumer it was, people like you were reacting to the name-calling and shitflinging, making us all look like a joke. I chose to drop out of the movement and quit people altogether because of the reputation I got from being associated with people like you.
Face facts, we failed because of the people we let be associated with us, i.e. you. We made the mistake of not distancing ourselves quick enough for it not to ruin the whole thing, but no one led you to the other side and told you to go nuts, you did that all by yourself.
And if you're thinking of replying with"You're not a REAL supporter of the movement", don't bother. I joined the movement with the best intentions, I wanted to get my point across rationally, not to insult people like you did.
