People give up on arguments by saying pokemon was always shit. Personal opinion incoming: what you mean is that every game had flaws, which is true. That doesn't mean all the games are bad. They're only bad if the cons outweigh the pros, and my personal belief is that no pokemon game has fewer pros than cons. However, this is unfortunate because sales will not reflect quality. Sales change more depending on the audience than the game quality. The fact still remains that some games are probably more of what fans want than other games. The sad part is that there is no financial pressure to correct the smaller flaws because of this. Any civil thoughts?