I was discussing this on /v/ a while ago. The simple answer is probably, or at least most likely you'll be seen as one. Pokemon, as in the creatures themselves, are very closely related to the furry fandom. Who are the people who draw Pokemon porn and coomsume it? The way we perceive things is very important.
>>48266388I wouldn't put it like that. I think people severely overrate how normalfag friendly some Pokemon are because they really aren't, they're still Pokemon and that in itself carries a lot of baggage. Within the framework of the Pokemon only, yeah, Gardevoir, Tsareena is mostly forgotten, carries SOME normalfag appeal but it's very, very overblown. In a wider furry framework it's actually not much. Characters like Isabelle from Animal Crossing and especially Lola Bunny are much more normalfag friendly. I'm using reddit's r34 as a sample size because it almost 2 million users and thousands of active users plus what they upvote is pretty normal. It's about as good as you can get for a "normal" crowd.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rule34/search/?q=gardevoir&restrict_sr=1&sort=tophttps://www.reddit.com/r/rule34/search/?q=isabelle&restrict_sr=1&sort=tophttps://www.reddit.com/r/rule34/search/?q=lola&restrict_sr=1&sort=topAnd just for good measure, dark magician girl
https://www.reddit.com/r/rule34/search/?q=dark%20magician%20girl&restrict_sr=1&sort=topAs we can see here Gardevoir actually isn't all that "normalfag" friendly but it has a lot of porn. 2x the amount of both DMG and Isabelle and 6x Lola's porn count. But it does show that in a more general crowd that it's not as friendly as some other furry characters. Basically how "normalfag" is overrated and overblown. Being a Pokemon not only carries the context of the franchise but also how people see the thing.
