>>48408982>you're arguing what could be instead of what is.Yes, that is precisely what type changes are predicated on in the first place. And not only this but you commit another fallacy, which is you explicitly reject a premise because it already assumes the argument when that does not logically follow. It is sufficient that mind control and Psychic type contribute to a Dark type, while it is not necessary (as of course, Grumpig is not part Dark) it provides reasonable basis for an external action upon a closed system. We are not discussing whether Grumpig is Dark type or not, we are discussing the possibility of changing it to so.
>You only have Malamar for your argument and that doesn't help you much cause it's still PsychicAllow me to rephrase this. I possess the argumentative element of Malamar, which shows the conjunction of a Dark type (qualities intrinsic to evil, deception, trickery) and Psychic type (matters of mind, telepathy) and observe an intersection results in mind control. Thus I possess evidence that a similarly tactical Pokemon should conceptually fit within this framework neatly. Do you follow?
The exercise of figuring out how many cocks a day you suck will be subsequently left to the reader.
