>>48441105>It's designed that way because the public wanted it to be designed for that purpose.Yes, because it has a function. People want to sit down and rest in peace. If it can do that, then it serves it's function and thus, is objectively good quality. Now, whether the visual design of the chair appeases you is subjective.
>And if you don't know what you want yet?Like I said, can't you see the art for yourself and determine whether or not you like it enough to buy it?
>I don't see how the concept of user reviews is this mind boggling to you. And I don't see how you constantly need to bend the knee to whatever's the popular opinion and not think for yourself, as if review bombing doesn't exist. You might even liked something that most people don't, but does that mean you're wrong for liking it and must change your opinion accordingly to suit the popular demand?
> Is it because it doesn't fit your socialist endgame?Why bring up politics all of a sudden?
