>>48461293>Except no one did this.They did you commie revisionist. This isn't one of your /his/ threads so you're not getting away with changing history to fit your worldview.
>This is infact the opposite, where Pokemon has as much competition as Coke doesWhich is still a leftist argument as you're upset that Pokemon is making money just like how college commies get upset over Amazon.
>and people said they were going to play other games....while still posting here and whining all day instead of just not buying and moving on
>How is this communistic?Its an appeal to equality. Just like saying "all humans are important" while ignoring slackers.
>The fuck are you even talking about? You have to be a genuine moron to believe /vp/ affected the networth of a company like GameFreak.Brought it up as in being this
>>48461149 anon and crying over companies that are successful. The commie thinks he is entitled to things because a company has a high net worth.
